What is to Be Done?
Writing hypothetical policies isn't enough. We need to get organised. But what kind of organisation is most effective?
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F3ddb621f-c72a-413b-9548-dae03288be18_1024x1024.jpeg)
It’s boring for me to repeat yet again Richard Hanania’s famous essay ‘Why is Everything Liberal?’ The Woke care more than us, and are willing to spend more time devoted to politics than we are.
Yes, we can say how we are subject to censorship and repression. But weren’t they also? It’s easy to be resentful and say groups like the LGBT movement always got things handed to them on a plate, but that isn’t true. There was a time when they really were shut out of the mainstream of society, and that to come out as gay really did mean you suffered negative social consequences.
But they were willing to endure that pain barrier. They were willing to put everything on the line, in their case, to corrupt and pervert our society.
And it is most damning on those of us who want to defend and restore a healthy body politic. Do we really have less ‘will to power’ than perverts and degenerates? It appears that yes, we do, because they have power, and we don’t. Anglos have debased themselves to a degree that sodomites enjoy a privileged status in their society.
One of the most humiliating things about seeing the rainbow flag everywhere, is that in some sense, they earned it. They were more willing to fight for their beliefs, beliefs that institutionalise decadence and degeneracy, than you were yours, to defend the proud civilisation of your forefathers. You weren’t prepared to make any sacrifices, any inconveniences, any small amount of social sanction to keep the Woke plague at bay, and as a result of previous generation’s cowardice, the Woke continued to win and win and win, and the social costs of resisting became greater, and greater, and greater.
So we face a steep road ahead. All straight White men deserve collective guilt for the miserable state we find ourselves in today, as I have mentioned in a previous article. But we owe it to future generations to not have the same pathetic cowardice that most straight White men since WWII have had. We must combine intellect, social capital, and ‘will to power’ to push back against the tide of Wokeism.
It’s no good me just saying this stuff. They’ll laugh and say we won’t do anything, and judging by our non-stop losing streak for the past 80 years, such smugness is unfortunately quite rational.
Therefore, the burden of proof is on us, to turn the tide against the cultural left’s hegemonic grasp on power.
In Britain, we need to actually start building institutions, investing time, energy, money, and most importantly, social status, if we really and truly believe in the cause for which we fight. The people who will ostracise you are not worth your time, you should have enough self-belief in yourself to not care about what these sheep think about you.
I’m going to be exploring what we can do RIGHT NOW, understanding that time is finite.
Starting the Vanguard
This is the first step, where the rest follows. It is something that we should actively plan to do. Of course it will need funding of some kind, but I do believe this would be a far better use of money than the millions that Laurence Fox has been given and squandered, and indeed even without such generous funding, it is something we can do.
The Trotskyist Lesson
John Kelly describes the character of various British Trotskyist groups in his excellent book ‘Contemporary Trotskyism’. Most important to their success is the incredible passion and devotion they inspire, with members expected to attend every meeting and as many events as they can.
Militant, one of the most successful Trotskyist organisations in Britain’s history, that was able to elect 2 MPs through the Labour Party, and control Liverpool City Council throughout the 1980s, started gaining members through the youth wing of Labour, Labour Party Young Socialists (LPYS), in the late 1960s, and tirelessly worked to get to their maximum point of strength in the middle of the 1980s.
They did this through an absolute confidence that the future was global communism, and that capitalism would be swept to the dustbin of history in less than a decade. Part of why the left wins, though it was the cultural left which succeeded rather than groups like these, is because of their incredible sense of optimism and self-belief.
They also had a very comprehensive ideology, that of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin, and Leon Trotsky, with these four figures like the four divine prophets in their worldview.
When people say you need religion to beat Wokeism, Marxism disproves that. Marxists don’t believe in the supernatural, but they do have absolute belief in a destiny for mankind.
Michael Crick recounts how Militant was able to infiltrate the LPYS through a long and patient process, with these vanguard of activists sacrificing everything for the ideals in which they fought. When I still thought infiltrating the Conservative Party was the direction we needed to go down (which I am less sure of now since Nigel Farage’s return to lead Reform), I analysed Militant (as well as Momentum) and their attempts and failures to transform Labour at length, and covered it in the article about the Tory Party which you might want to check out.
This shows what you can do with a highly committed and highly organised group of people who believe in a cause. We may not desire the overthrow of capitalism, but with half of their dedication, we could achieve something far more achievable.
Patriots United
Patriots United has a chance of being an important vanguard organisation, willing to work with and build bridges between other groups but maintaining their own identity. They therefore seem a good organisation to get involved in.
I compare Patriots United’s idea of building a confederation of various right-wing parties in Britain to the Trotskyist attempts at trying to build a ‘mass workers party’, though their Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) never really went anywhere, and we should study the reasons for why that failed. Luckily, our beliefs are more popular and defensible than Marxism.
Patriots United are trying to set themselves up to be a community organisation and Political Action Committee (PAC) in Britain, operating primaries (that unlike in the US but like in France, can only work through voluntary co-operation) for right-wing anti-Woke candidates of various parties, and creating a community counter-culture.
The base is overwhelmingly made up of young people, and includes many women. They have done a lot to distance themselves from the thuggish style of British National Party (BNP) and English Defence League rallies. They are still growing and trying to get recognition from the big names like the Lotus Eaters.
For this election they will not be a player because it has happened earlier than many of them expected. But they do look very promising, and I believe they could amount to a very effective ‘vanguard organisation’ if they are able to attract the right kinds of people, and therefore be able to establish specialised ‘front organisations’ in the various functions that I’m going to suggest.
If you are not aware of them, make sure to check them out on X spaces, sign up to their email newsletter on their website, and join their Telegram (which will be given once you are approved onto their X group.)
Getting on Campus
We are frequently taunted about how other young people aren’t on our side; but continental Europe shows that isn’t an inevitability. We must devote our energy to entryism into various right-wing youth organisations, and actually get on college campuses to present our ideas. We need to do this so we get people in all different fields, such as law and media, to be able to further our ideas using their respective skills.
Many right-wing student organisations have tried this. They are big in the US, but here they have never really caught on outside of the Association of Conservative Students (party organisation).
On campuses, where the future elites reside, the Conservative Students is often the only semi-safe space for students of a right-wing persuasion, even though many of them are led by CINOs (Conservatives in Name Only). In order to attract recruits to our vanguard organisation, it is necessary to join Conservative student associations, though mass entryism into the Conservative Party is a futile endeavour and it may be that it fades in relevance after this election.
Another major reason why right-wing student organisations have failed is that they do not have a good ideology. Turning Point UK is a copy and paste of American conservatism onto Britain, which doesn’t resonate here. Groups like Reasoned UK are IDW-adjacent containment groups, though many in both of those may be persuaded to join our organisation.
Battle of Ideas is a good conference for the populist right, even though most of its speakers have not moved past 2016 with the Intellectual Dark Web (IDW) ethos still predominant. However, despite its ideological weaknesses, has many young people in attendance, and some of my closest friends having been met there. A vanguard organisation like Patriots United should request a stall at Battle of Ideas and they would probably be permitted to have one.
If Nigel Farage agrees to set up a Young Reform UK, that would be a goldmine for entryism to gain supporters, and we should definitely do it.
Primaries
Channelling the Labour Representation Committee, the predecessor of the Labour Party back in the late 19th and early 20th century, ‘Patriots United’ should have members in various different parties of the Right, the goal is simply to facilitate primaries in as many constituencies as possible. This energy should be led by a well-organised group of passionate young people, who will have been persuaded to join the organisation on campuses and various youth groups, as well as a strong social media presence.
Sometimes we might stand aside for Reform, or even a Tory MP if they have a particularly good record, with the knowledge that they probably wouldn’t reciprocate, just like the LRC did for pro-labour Liberal Party candidates. If Reform have a realistic chance of winning a seat in the 2029 election, we should vote to endorse them even if they don’t formally participate.
This primary system will require a large degree of organisation and ground game across the country. It will be important to log and publish online positions of various candidates, and give them a scorecard, something I will talk about further down.
What Would the Ideology of this Organisation Be?
It is very important that this group has a very concise and clear ideology on where it wants Britain to go. It needs to be something that we are as committed to fight for as the Woke are committed to fighting for their ideals.
Ethno-Cultural National Democracy
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F17f5ac98-74ef-442d-93c2-c5a04bd5a97c_308x465.jpeg)
In Britain, a form of nationalism is the most likely uniting force. Unlike the United States, we are still mostly of one ethnicity, Anglo-Celtic, and have a history going back a millennia. Whilst demographic change has eaten into the percentage of White Britons, it is still large enough that, if we stop future immigration now, ethno-cultural nationalism can still be a viable force.
The type of nationalism should be ethno-cultural. This means that it would recognise that British culture is inseparable from the ethnicity of Anglo-Celtic people that created said culture, and would make it very clear that we do not want this population to become a minority in the country which it made.
On the other hand, those of only partially Anglo-Celtic stock, or even those of non-Anglo-Celtic ethnicity, who nevertheless choose to identify with the culture of Britain, to the exclusion of a separate, competing identity, may also be considered British depending on their attitudes.
A patriotic Black British person may be considered British. But one who puts the interests of other Blacks above the indigenous British population, protests to ‘decolonise’ British institutions, British society, things particular to the indigenous British people like the English countryside or folk music, or promotes ‘colourblind casting’ in historical movie and television roles that have no purpose other than to erase the history of Anglo-Celts, is not British, but an enemy of Britain. If you are non-White, your Britishness can and will be dependent on your loyalty to Britain and its historical ethnic group, and those that promote Critical Race Theory prove themselves to be hostile to the indigenous British population, and therefore, not truly British.
Race deserves to be a factor in immigration. We should desire a memorandum on all future immigration for a decade, and afterwards ‘White Net-Zero’ at a maximum. White Christian immigrants are able to assimilate in a single generation, whereas non-Whites, as Enoch Powell feared, have not assimilated above a ‘paper-thin sense’, and have created an alien bloc hostile to the interests of the body politic, as proven by electoral vehicles like ‘The Muslim Vote’ and ‘The Hindu Vote’ We should try and obscure this in our public-facing material, talking about ‘cultural compatibility’, in a way that is publicly palatable without fundamentally changing our views, but the fact of the matter is that White immigrants are more desirable, and Brexit ended up being a catastrophe for this reason.
Other than this, we would advocate for the usual list of policies commonly associated with parties of the populist Right in order to maintain Britain’s demographic integrity and cripple the power of Wokeism.
We should distance ourselves from Neo-Nazis and Holocaust Deniers, conspiratorial types like anti-vaxxers and climate change deniers, and skinheads, thugs, and football hooligans who direct their venom towards the law-abiding immigrant communities themselves. We would completely reject the totalitarian fascist regimes, and should emphasise that our vision is ‘National Democracy’.
Democracy as a system where all citizens are entitled to vote, was predicated on the idea of the ‘nation state’, of all citizens being a member of a particular nation and therefore having that right as a national tradition.
Without a strong sense of national identity, voting becomes a ‘human right’, and then all groups can claim ‘human rights’, which inevitably expand until you have the European Court of Human Rights telling Romania that they must legalise gay marriage or else they are violating ‘human rights’ (which luckily they have refused so far).
In the view of National Democracy, you have the right to vote in Britain because you are British, not because you are ‘human’.
National Democracy was the 19th century ideal, the twin forces of universal manhood suffrage and Romantic Nationalism. I still have issues with universal suffrage, preferring a system which requires contribution like military service or taxes. But if we HAVE to have universal suffrage (which I think we do), it should be on a ethno-cultural basis, something akin to ‘British Jacksonian Democracy’. This is a tradition that will best motivate people to fight for, both for their blood and soil, and for their historic freedoms and popular sovereignty.
Countering Demoralisation
The British people NEVER CONSENTED to become a multicultural country, and they rejected it in every single election. It was something that was imposed upon them by their elites, who gradually manufactured compliance and surrender. These days, non-Whites laugh at us and mock us, gloating that we are doomed to become an ethnic minority in our own country and there is nothing we can do to stop them.
An ethno-cultural kind of ideology might seem beyond the pale. The National Front and BNP tried this (though they were a little harsher on the ethnic character of Britishness) yet they were still crushed. It has become deeply ingrained within us to think that such an exercise is fruitless, and that it is ‘too late’.
What must be our goal is countering demoralisation. We need to remind people that ‘Hope Not Hate’ and ‘Unite Against Fascism’ do not have to win, and do not have to dictate their lives. Their calls for ‘kindness’, ‘friendship’, and ‘welcoming the stranger’ may have worked in the era of Tony Blair, when the colourblind ethos of ‘Fresh Prince’ still reigned. But since the proliferation of Wokeism and anti-White racism throughout all centres of power, this has proven it was a ruthless swindle of the indigenous British population.
It might be inconvenient to face up to this fact. Most people would shudder at the thought that they might agree with us, because they subconsciously know these views will cost them everything if publicly expressed. But hope must be given that ‘it doesn’t have to be this way’. The fact that they live in a state of perpetual fear is the result of choices that were made by previous generations, and if the people of this generation make a different choice, they could change it.
Other Anti-Woke Causes
From ethno-cultural nationalism and White advocacy comes other anti-Woke beliefs. This ideology would be anti-feminist as it would be emphasise the importance of replacement level birthrates, and the view that men and women should see themselves as interdependent as opposed to competitors. It would be anti-LGBT, as they are mutilating British children and actively desecrating a biologically healthy population.
’s ‘White Advocacy as a Political Paradigm’ did a great deal to persuade me that anti-Whiteness is the cornerstone of Woke ideology. I might personally be most repulsed by the LGBT stuff, but underlying it all, feminism, LGBT, BLM, fat pride and ‘body positivity’, is a hatred of Whiteness in all its forms, including a healthy White population, and the culture that White people built.As Eric Kaufmann has said, the plague of Wokeness has come from a pathological indulgence of ‘minority rights’ since WWII and the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. If we are to stop all movements of the ‘Intersectional Coalition’, we need to attack it at it’s absolute root, and that is the viewing of racism as the ultimate taboo.
What Activities Would this Organisation Engage In?
A lot of the work will be very boring. We should prepare people who join us that it isn’t going to be long chats about theory all the time, but actually getting out there and doing hard and thankless work to persuade people and get them to join.
This would not involve street rallies and, at no point, hurling racial slurs at minority communities, that have disgraced previous generations of right-wing activists. This should be a movement of the well-educated and middle-class, with the ‘Football Hooligans’ excluded. There would be a sufficient amount of political theory and intellectualism to make those people feel unwelcome.
Like Trotskyist organisations, we would develop a variety of ‘front’ organisations in different areas. One might be on culture, another for law, a separate young women’s section that will engage in the TERF movement, etcetra.
Exposure and Registry of Enemies
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F9e0d0500-05f0-4430-a291-ac4eb1e8f21f_900x600.png)
Aside from building youth support and setting up the primaries, the most important thing we need to do is follow the recommendations of
’s terrific article ‘Don’t Get Angry at Woke, Get Even’. It is unfortunately behind a paywall, so I will try and sum up the same core ideas, whilst recommending that those who are able to, become ‘paychads.’Hope Not Hate and the various ‘anti-fascist’ groups are able to neuter any right-wing movement in Britain by vigorously listing and documenting anybody who goes against the Woke line, fishing through their social media comment history for anything that can be used against them. It’s the same with the anti-smoking lobby, that is able to accuse anybody who goes against them as being ‘in the pocket of the tobacco industry’.
Hope Not Hate takes credit for sinking Susan Hall’s London Mayoral bid, and though that’s probably embellished, they have far more institutional credibility and grassroots support than they deserve. Reform UK’s capitulation to them by de-selecting candidates hasn’t stopped the press attacks on Reform candidates being ‘racist’, but it has demoralised a great deal of supporters.
The first thing we need to do is develop a database of MPs and various public figures. We need to work out who’s on our side and who isn’t, expose funding networks, and be able to share this database with people across the right-wing space, levelling at them the accusation of being on the payroll of various international NGOs (which will be accurate, though inevitably so will we). Politicians that capitulate to Hope Not Hate need to be deemed ‘enemies’ and not worked with, put on what is in effect a blacklist.
It is important that we also develop a consistent understanding of ‘No Enemies to the Right’. We should say it is not unreasonable to ask candidates to clean their social media history before running under a party label, and slur words are an embarrassment, as are conspiracy theorists (which are ironically tolerated far more than ‘racists). But when it comes to the actual content of one’s beliefs, like believing in HBD or questioning whether Britain benefitted from fighting WW2, we should defend them to the hilt.
Epistemological and Referencing Anchor
We should also build our own version of ‘Rational Wiki’, that whilst founded by New Atheists in the 2000s, has become a means for ‘anti-fascists’ to defame anybody discussing issues like HBD or questioning transgender extremism. As Wikipedia is controlled by the Woke regime, as exposed by Larry Sanger (co-founder) and Chris Rufo’s investigation of Katherine Maher’s leadership at Wikimedia Foundation, we need to create an alternative source of reference, not descending into the low IQ chuddishness of ‘Conservapedia’, but applying Occams Razor, the empirical falsification principle of Karl Popper and Imre Lakatos, and source criticism, including cross-referencing and cross-examination.
It should not be an explicitly ‘right-wing’ project, but simply oriented towards a common set of facts, one that is geared towards an empirical worldview. For instance, it would try and present the issue of Trump in as fair and as balanced a manner as possible, discussing the Twitter Files, Mueller Report, and Durham Report as well as Bill Barr, Mike Pence’s, and numerous Trump-appointed judges dismissal of the ‘Hard Big Lie’ as Trump pushed it. It would have a less strict criteria of what constitutes a ‘reliable source’, and would not blindly accept the narratives of Western media like the New York Times, Washington Post, the BBC, or The Guardian, but only if narratives they push can be concurred with other sources. It would accept biological sex realism, and would have a policy of never using ‘preferred pronouns’, but only pronouns of people’s correct biological sex, and will class transgenderism as a pseudoscience.
Such a resource is vital if the Right is able to operate on a high epistemological standard and not get sucked up down a conspiracy vortex. We need to create an alternative ‘anchor’ to the mainstream that uses a superior and more essentialist lens , with no biased concerns about ‘human rights’.
We would have our own view of ‘false balance’. To have transgenderism and biological sex realism seen as equally legitimate would be seen as such, as the latter clearly deserves priority.
The Wiki would see things in a similar way to how a university professor from the early to mid 20th century would have done.
Legal Division
A great amount of time, effort, and money should be invested in creating a legal division, or winning over an existing one with our ideas.
The Free Speech Union (FSU) started strong but it is still overwhelmingly IDW, and that means they weren’t prepared to defend Sam Melia, a member of Patriotic Alternative imprisoned and having no contact with his children because he posted stickers saying ‘Reject White Guilt’. If Hope Not Hate sues us for publishing their stuff, we need the means to counter-sue them.
Bad Law Project (BLP) is another promising venture, that is an antidote to the odious Good Law Project (who’s founder is a zealous true believer in mutilating children), with us needing a counterweight to the vast establishment of ‘lefty lawyers’. This is partly why it’s so important to get on university campuses, law students are the kinds of people we desperately want on side. We need them to join our organisation, get exposed to our ideas, go to work in currently IDW organisations like FSU and BLP once they graduate and have knowledge of the legal system, and push these organisations in a more radical direction. The aim shouldn’t be ‘free speech’, but doing what our enemies already accuse us of doing, trying to ostracise Woke opinions from public life.
We also need to create our own equivalent of the Federalist Society to be able to replace Woke judges when we come to power. The ‘Society of Conservative Lawyers’ could be repurposed for this.
Culture and Memeing
Generally, the ‘anti-fascists’ and ‘anti-racists’ should be seen for what they are: utter scum who are the cause of so many of our modern ills, and the desecration of our once great nation. Due to showing such consistent contempt for it, and doing everything in their power to undermine it fairly successfully, the time for free speech is over.
It should be THEIR views that are ostracised, THEIR opinions that they must self-censor, and THEY should be the ones who are humiliated, ridiculed, and seen as the pathetic losers they are, de-humanised to the fullest possible degree.
The maintenance of a free society requires the repression of these Woke thugs who will subvert it, the true ‘Paradox of Tolerance’. There is nothing admirable or brave about those that kept their countrymen down all throughout the post-war period, and ensured our disgusting present, where Wokeism occupies all the institutions of power and has manufactured obedience, became a reality.
We need to control the narrative. The ‘anti-fascists’ can never be seen as in any way the underdogs, but as the smug bullies who relish in betraying their own people and keeping heterosexual White people down, whilst triumphantly flaunting how they never lost at any stage in their ever-radicalising quest to further destroy and desecrate our society.
To do this, we need to have a very well thought through memeing strategy. I still think it is absolutely crucial to develop a word for a ‘White Uncle Tom’, that is well-known enough that it gets onto Know Your Meme. We need to have a word to encapsulate the cucked racial treason of Woke straight White men.
We need to get on 4Chan and start trying out different memes to see what sticks. Song creation, that
did in the Alt-Right when he had a YouTube channel called ‘UnCuck the Right’.With the advent of AI, there is absolutely no excuse whatsoever for not engaging in culture creation.
Whilst racial slurs are off-limits, the Woke straight White man shall bear the brunt of our venom, for it is he who has allowed the destruction of our once great nation over the past 80 years.
We need to instil a racial consciousness in straight White men. We need to affirm what they already think and believe but keep to themselves, that everywhere they are the punching bags in society, yet have been demoralised enough to think it will always be this way.
We must constantly remind them how much the establishment hates them and keeps them down, through online memes and printing of memes on lampposts and stickers. The goal is to make them feel angry, humiliated, and resentful.
But this won’t necessarily get people to openly join us. The ‘fascists’ have been ridiculed enough and are seen as losers. People will think ‘it’s hopeless, the cultural left always get their way in the end’.
So we need to have a positive message as well. We need to use continental Europe to show what’s possible, and as J’Accuse also said, frame our goals as inevitabilities. We need to have the confidence to believe that we are on the ‘right side of history’, and never be demoralised. Even if it looks like we’re losing, we must keep up the appearance that victory is just around the corner. An intelligent combination of a feeling of powerlessness and hopelessness, and then a ‘here’s what we can do about it, join us’, is what we need in our messaging.
Attractive women being the deliverers of these messages is also extremely important. For all people will say it shows ‘weak character’ to ‘depend on the opinion of women’, the bottom line is that a great many young men do. It’s fear of not being liked by girls that keeps a great many straight White men compliant in the Woke regime. This is why attractive women are such an enormous asset, and anybody who calls them ‘grifters’ and men that are persuaded by them ‘simps’ a poisonous influence who doesn’t understand how to market to young men.
In cultural production we should work with all kinds of right-wing groups, even Neo-Nazi’s (so long as they don’t make it all about the Jews). We need to:
Show people what the pre-1960s West was like and how much they’ve lost.
Remind people, particularly White men, just how much society hates them.
Remind people of demographic change and the smug celebration of it by non-Whites and self-loathing Whites.
Constantly reinforce the idea of the ‘anti-fascists’ being the villains of history. Get people to resent groups like ‘Rock Against Racism’ for creating modern Britain where Whites are so routinely demonised.
Get people to resent their fathers and grandfathers for not doing more to stop Wokeism, and pledge that they can be a generational turning point. They can correct the mistakes previous generations of straight White men (and women) made, but that this will be the last chance, before White Britons become a conquered and outnumbered people like the Palestinians.
Whilst not shying away from where we are now (youth Wokeness), instil in people that minds can be changed. Eric Kaufmann’s ‘young people will be Woke forever’ is unhelpful.
Get people to get into their minds the concept of the ‘Neocon Cycle’, that every time they accede to the cultural left’s demands, their power and prestige in society only grows.
Make anti-LGBT a key part of the platform as well, particularly how it threatens women’s rights and child safety.
Use of humour. Use ‘jokes’ and then if accused of having an ideological motive, play dumb and accuse the opposition of being puritanical, a very successful tactic used by the Alt-Right.
Get people to reject the ‘Boomer Truth Regime’.
Creates memes explaining what the 1998 Human Rights Act, 2003 Communications Act, 2004 Gender Recognition Act, 2005 Constitutional Reform Act, 2006 Equality Act, 2010 Equality Act, and 2011 Charities Act do, why they are bad, and why they all must be repealed.
Make it a constant slogan to demonise the term ‘human rights’, saying it is Trojan Horse for Wokeism.
Utilise Apu the Frog to create our own equivalent of the Groypers. Combine Apu the Frog with Anglofuturism.
Make seemingly apolitical and ironic jokes about Hitler to desensitise people to him. We are not Neo-Nazi’s, but the treatment of Hitler as the real life Voldemort is a bedrock of the ‘Boomer Truth Regime’, which perpetuates Wokeness.
Whenever the ‘anti-fascists’ get knowledge of us, we should use the power of video to record their most damning moments. People need to see what these people are and how little sympathy they deserve. The ‘SJW Cringe Compilation’ needs to be revived as the ‘Woke Cringe Compilation’.
We also need to do similar stunts to the Groyper Wars at Turning Point USA, at places like Spiked, Reasoned UK, and all these Koch Brothers-funded lolbertarian organisations that want to redirect energy to denying climate change.
The ‘Spirit of 16’, where it felt like we were winning and the pendulum finally swinging against the ‘Spirit of 68’, needs to return.
Personnel Organisation
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fcfde7f5e-c2ba-459b-bce9-910c08d6ce34_900x400.png)
We need to have people who work in powerful, well-connected think-tanks push for a personnel organisation similar to Project 2025, to replace Woke Civil Servants when the Right returns to power. We need a systematic roadmap of where the weak points are to be able to outmanoeuvre and purge the Deep State, like the Gulen Movement did in Türkiye.
Various members in key positions of the New Culture Forum and Centre for Policy Studies would be extremely useful for crafting a personnel network on the level of Project 2025 in the United States.
I strongly advocated for this a few months ago, and luckily, it seems that the New Culture Forum is facilitating it, having arranged a meeting of various right-wing think-tanks to create something similar to this. Dominic Cummings is also exploring it, even though he is ideologically quite different to us (the man behind Boris-ism, and the squandered chance of that.)
But until young people wanting to get into the British right-wing political scene have as many opportunities as their American counterparts, we should heavily focus on building this personnel organisation.
We should get to a point where in 10 to 15 years, when a party of the Right is in a position to take power, we have a whole reactionary vanguard counter-elite ready to replace the top levels of the Civil Service as soon as the new government takes office, and bury the Blairite Deep State once and for all. De-Wokeification needs to happen across all elite institutions, similar to the De-Nazification process in post-war West Germany.
In it’s place will be an establishment and Deep State which is socially conservative, like prior to 1997. The Civil Service will once again become dominated by straight White men, with a passionate desire for retribution for their discrimination over the past 30 years, with pleas for ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusivity’ from ‘women and minorities’ met with laughter and swift negative repercussions. The lesson of the mid to late 20th centuries is to never accommodate these ‘civil rights movements’, but dig your heels in and make no concessions, as it is only seen as weakness and a permission to keep on disrespecting you (straight White men).
We need to create complete counter-elite, consisting of lawyers, journalists, researchers, journals, educators, and government workers, all sections of society that determine the society’s values and political direction, that reject the entirety of Woke doctrine, that has been on a slow road to power since 1945.
This will take time to create, and it is crucial we start as soon as possible. The vanguard organisation needs to articulate its ideas in mainstream conservative circles in line with the current Overton Window, and gradually moving the discourse. It is essential that these ideas are parroted out by well-educated, elite people, not football hooligans.
We must get to a point where it is ‘high status’ to be anti-Woke and ‘low status’ to be Woke. We must not succumb to doomerism but have confidence that this can and will be achieved through our cultural vanguard and various front organisations to build elite connections.
Conclusion
All of this will take decades to achieve, but if we are painstaking about making this happen, we should get started right away. Make plans in your own personal life to get organised, start new organisations in a field of expertise or occupation, attend productive meetings, and build alliances.
Patriots UK needs to be made a success. It is a decentralised movement that can be resistant to de-banking and deplatforming, relying on the dedication and will of it’s members to change society.
We should also not see this simply as a chore, but as a source of fun. Whilst it may take decades to achieve what we want, in the meantime we should enjoy our counter-cultural niche and the friends we make along the way.
Zoomers are a generation lacking anything to believe in, which is why Woke fads like transgenderism have seen cancerous growth. We need to create a movement of Zoomers that goes in the complete opposite direction, having an anti-establishment appeal as the establishment is controlled by our enemies. We need to create a cool ‘alternate space’, filled with well-educated people and attractive women, who are united by our common devotion to the cause of defending our country, that our ancestors built and that we wish to pass onto our descendants.
So click on those links, don’t terrorism LARP or do anything that will lead to a crackdown, and start planning the future we want to create.
And again: Look to Denmark and the Danish Peoples Party. They combined popular (and really common sense) social policies with a radical agenda on immigration, as well as striking the beast right in the heart with their rejection of “experts” and the whole deep state apparatus.
This was years before Trump. And it was popular.
There are a couple errors in the initial analysis here. First of all if someone is a conservative then they have to defend what their conserving on every front. However, the people that wish to advocate for a given change only have to attack on one front. Any military historian will tell you that the defending side almost always loses in that case.
Similarly the person who is trying to make a society change is all super excited about the change they’re trying to make. The person who wishes for the society to remain as it has been simply wishes to continue to live their life.