Why Straight White Men Deserve Wokeness
We let ourselves be guilt-tripped and emotionally blackmailed, but taking responsibility for our failures is the first step to fixing them.
The affair of David Austin Walsh shows the sorry, miserable image of the ‘Woke straight White man’. The history professor acknowledged DEI policies in academia were stopping him getting employment. Yet the moment people on the right reached out to him, he threw himself back to the Woke side, and denounced those sympathising with him as ‘bigots; a textbook case of Stockholm Syndrome.
The word ‘cucked’ does not even begin to describe the likes of David Austin Walsh. The husband of a promiscuous whore who slept with hundreds of other men with his knowledge for decades, carries a relative level of dignity when compared to straight White men like Walsh.
Woke straight White men need to get more attention than they currently do. They represent the ‘lowest of the low’, the most pathetic, disgusting, and treasonous group in the ‘Woke Coalition’.
We can understand why a Black person would support Critical Race Theory, to benefit his own group. To a lesser extent, we can understand why a woman would be a feminist, to benefit her own interests. Even the LGBTs, despite their whole ‘identity’ being a construct and utterly undeserving of respect, do have group loyalty, and understand their interests as a collective.
But straight White men have no sense of, or respect for, their group interests, and as such, do not demand group loyalty. Therefore, the likes of David Austin Walsh will carry on selling out his own people for the wider goal of ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’, carry on apologising for his White privilege, and carry on promising to ‘educate himself’, with no social sanction from his kin whatsoever.
Why We Must Ostracise the ‘White Uncle Tom’
4Chan needs to come up with a unique term to describe Woke straight White men.
‘Cuck’ and ‘race traitor’ may apply, but are lacking in punch and underscore the severity of the offense. The new term needs to be an attack on both their masculinity and their group loyalty, not just one of the two.
It should be a term with so much sting, that to be labelled as such can only be responded to with a fist fight to restore one’s honour. As a point of comparison, it needs to carry the stigma of a word like ‘paedophile’.
The way Blacks see ‘Uncle Toms’ or Jews see ‘Kapos’, is how we should see Justin Trudeau or Prince Harry (who admitted that he had been ‘bigoted’ before he met his vindictive, social-climbing wife Meghan Markle).
They should be totally ostracised from White spaces. It is repugnant, odious individuals like these who allowed anti-White discrimination to become institutionalised, who in the mid and late 20th century actually signed laws and regulations to sell out their sons, grandsons, and great grandsons.
‘White Guilt’ is not only not virtuous. It is morally disgusting. These people deserve no commendation, and no praise for being on the ‘right side of history’ or being ‘aware of their privilege’. They are nothing more than disgusting race traitors, and if they belonged to an ethnic group with an ounce of self-respect, would be totally excluded and shunned from it, and probably subjected to physical violence.
Straight White Male Complicity in Wokeness
And as long as figures like David Austin Walsh and Robin DiAngelo exist, us Whites deserve Wokeness. Indeed, what they call ‘White allies’, ‘male allies’, ‘straight allies’ have been part and parcel of every ‘civil rights cause’ and were indispensable for Wokeism coming to power. More importantly, they were overwhelmingly the ones who signed off the legislation and made the court rulings.
Many people like to blame White self-loathing on Jews, putting forward the narrative that they disguised themselves as ‘Fellow Whites’ in order to push for anti-White ideas from within, to ultimately destroy White civilisation.
It is true that the majority of elite Jews supported anti-majoritarian movements, as Franklin Foer, Jewish himself, admits in The Atlantic article ‘The Golden Age of American Jews is Ending’.
But who lifted the ‘Jewish Quotas’ in the first place? White Anglo-Saxon Protestants (WASPs), who genuinely believed in the doctrines of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
I am not doubting that Jews are massively overrepresented in Woke movements, but it can’t have been ‘just them’. Obviously, a great many WASPs found the ‘rights-based liberalism’ persuasive. Jews had none of the power to influence culture that they had in mid-century America elsewhere, like in Tsarist Russia, or even more extreme of an example, Nazi Germany (before they went crazy and did the Holocaust).
The hospitality of Anglo-Saxons towards corrosive elements in our society is our own doing. It was openness from the White Christian population to subversive ideas advocated disproportionately by Jews, not the majority of the Jews themselves, that is to blame for our current malaise.
If you look at the people who paved the way for Wokeness, only a minority of them were Jewish. John Dewey, Randolph Borne, Earl Warren, William O’Douglas, William J. Brennan Jr, Alfred Kinsey, Lyndon B. Johnson, and John Rawls, to give a few of the many examples, were all WASPs. In the case of the politicians and judges among them, it was they that drafted the legislation and court rulings that made Wokeism possible, with only a few of them Jews and almost none of them non-White.
The WASP elites faced a lack of confidence in themselves and their ethnic identity; which was as a result of the Puritan Protestant guilt-morality and introspection that was deeply rooted in American culture.
Wokeness was not something primarily driven by communists, though the Soviet Union did support the 1960s student counter-culture and New Left movements to a degree. It was something done by establishment White liberals, who had absorbed the New England Puritan ideals, and went on to make Civil Rights rulings and laws.
Whites were the only group who held to the high ideals of colorblindness, but this inherent good nature was ruthlessly swindled by non-Whites, who had no moral qualms about exploiting White generosity and sense of fair play.
At this point, this belief in fairness and equality from Whites has become in and of itself ‘immoral’. As I have said, to sell-out your own people is something morally disgusting, and we should treat it as such.
This is something Steve Sailer talks about in a recent article for Takis Magazine. Scott Greer in his IQ Supplement episode ‘the Brahmin and the Babbitt’, also talks about how the two main GOP archetypes in the mid and late 20th centuries, represented by George H. W Bush and Bob Dole, consistently were in favour of racial equality and diversity, and analyses how they both went down the path of selling out White interests.
Do We Deserve ‘High Status’?
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F58cf2ca5-be08-4e73-a4b3-ae25423d477c_1147x1600.png)
If we truly believe in a Nietzschean, ‘might makes right’ morality, so long as straight White men are discriminated against in the societies we built, we should first point our fingers at ourselves. What did we, as a people, do to get to this point, that we let this happen to us? And what are we doing which is allowing it to continue? If every straight White man, a group that constitutes the majority of elite human capital, refused to serve the Woke regime that discriminated against them, it would collapse almost instantly.
I mentioned in my last article the ‘The Causes of Wokeism and How to Dismantle Them All’ the ‘Lack of White Identity’ as one of the causes, but I don’t think I went into enough depth on how that could be changed.
In this article, I will discuss how anti-Woke, straight Whites, particularly men but also the based women in our circles and acknowledging that women and men are interdependent on each other, can defend themselves as a group, fight for their interests, and be confident in doing both.
We should apply the same standards to ourselves as we do every other group. We don’t respect Africans for being poor and underdeveloped, allowing themselves to be colonised by us. In contrast, we respect the Japanese for resisting colonisation, modernising, and proving their equality to the Europeans through military victory, economic development, and cultural output.
’s book ‘The New Art Right’ is a great read because she understands the psychology of how Woke people operate. Part of the reason why we loathe the Woke so much is because they have a passive-aggressive, feminine means of social status signalling that we don’t really understand, so all we feel is violent rage, which they laugh at, due to correctly sensing our powerlessnessFor all we talked about ‘owning the libs’ and ‘triggering people’, they are far more effective at triggering us than us triggering them. They have the self-confidence to believe that they really are superior to us, and indeed power and social trends are on their side.
It may seem like it was always like this for them, but that isn’t true, as the Woke narrative tells us constantly, they had to fight to gain a sense of group-pride.
African-Americans in the first half of the 20th century were a deeply self-loathing people. But generations of Black activists, such as Malcom X and the Nation of Islam, and people like Spike Lee who made the biopic of Malcom X’s life (which is a very well-made film, and worth a watch as a White advocate, as it is a film about ethnic pride) managed to instil a consciousness in African-Americans as to who they were, and to remove their ‘slave-names’ and in doing so, their slave mindset. Anti-colonial movements and intellectuals like Frantz Fanon and Ali Shariati often talked about ending the ‘colonisation of their minds’ and challenging the idea that European civilisation was superior, which many of them took for granted.
Both African-Americans and various colonised peoples understood that the enemy to their status as a people was just as much, if not more so, members of their own group, than it was their White overlords.
And likewise, whilst the LGBTs appear smug and confident, this was something that had to be learned. There is a reason why the time in June where they wave rainbows in everybody’s face is called ‘Pride’; it was an explicit rejection of the feeling of shame that most homosexuals before the LGBT rights movement had.
Now we can believe that these groups had far less to be proud of than we do, but the fact of the matter is that these people developed a sense of status within themselves, and actually fought for their status in society. And because they did that, and us straight White men didn’t, they deserve to have that, and we don’t.
As a collective, we LET them promote their group interests at the expense of ours. Not all White individuals did, George Wallace, David Duke, Jared Taylor, and many others dedicated their lives to fighting for their people. But the majority of White people and certainly the majority of White elites, did nothing to stop these groups rising and their group fortunes falling, because they didn’t conceptualise themselves as a ‘group’.
It isn’t just an elite phenomenon either; if working-class heterosexual Whites had really wanted to, they could have made their elites fight for their interests, and if they didn’t, replaced them with different elites. The intellectual material was all there.
But people did not prioritise these issues. Before Britain had anything like the hate speech laws it does now, and when there were still large parts of the establishment that were sympathetic, did the National Front in its heyday in the 1970s win the general election, or even gain any seats?
No. White people did not buy what the White Advocates among them were selling, they were seduced by the ‘anti-fascist’ arguments, and they kept on voting in politicians who accepted the ‘multi-ethnic Britain’, from which it is now essentially too late to change even if we minimise it.
And this is why I admire Rachel Haywire’s book so much. I’m sure she wasn’t the first to make this argument, but I had never heard the argument articulated in this way before; for decades, us straight White men have let feminist and minorities walk all over us, imprisoned in our minds by Social Gospel/New England virtue-signalling and moral guilt, and the false promise of Martin Luther King’s dream that only we ever believed in; indeed not even MLK himself took his words to heart like Whites did, in fact he blatantly lied about his intentions and what he said in his ‘I Have a Dream’ speech were not his real views
If we want to regain our standing, we must fight for it, just like those other groups did. We need to ostracise those of us who betray the interests of our group as a whole. What they do should in no way be seen as noble or benign.
Why We Need To Emphasise Whiteness, Not Christianity
Many of my readers are Christians, so I do know I’ve been harsh on them on the last couple of articles. But it is impossible not to see how the Christian moral-guilt complex has plagued Whites.
With other groups, they had enough aggression naturally within them genetically, and enough of a tribal mentality, to not take Christianity to its logical conclusion. But Whites, particularly in New England where the WASP elite predominantly came from, genuinely believed in the Biblical verse of Galatians 3:28: ‘There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.’
It’s clear that it was ‘true belief’ in the Christian ethos that made so many White men believe in the doctrine of Civil Rights Liberalism, and do everything they could do further it. But their faithful devotion to scripture allowed their good nature to be exploited.
Even nominally ‘conservative’ Christian denominations these days are Woke on most issues (with the possible exception of LGBT, though they are adamant to note that their views on sex apply ‘just as much’ to heterosexuals, reinforcing the false notion of equality). They fully endorsed the George Floyd Riots and the imposition of Critical Race Theory throughout the United States. The current Pope cites ‘welcoming the stranger’ to oppose any and all restrictions on immigration.
And whenever Whites try to resist, the Woke left can manipulate words from the Bible to get Whites to soften their resolve. Martin Luther King was in no way an actually believing Christian, but he knew how to weaponize scripture when it was convenient.
Since 1945, mainstream Christianity has done absolutely nothing to stop Wokeism from coming to power. It has conceded and capitulated on every Woke cause, the ‘White Man’s Religion’ always rushing to defend all other groups except Whites. Vatican II’s ‘opening up to the world’ led to a vast decrease in influence, Mainline Protestant denominations are in terminal decline… but yet they never think to course correct, because the Woke message is one that is mostly consistent with Christian doctrine, aside from the teachings about sex, which can be explained away and relativised ‘(who am I to judge?, ‘those of us who are without sin may lay the first stone’, ‘what about heterosexual promiscuity?’, ‘what about the poor?’)
Sam Francis in his later years grew to dislike Christianity for having erased the White man’s sense of identity and having consistently failed to stand up for his interests, and I agree with this assessment. Groups that claimed to be Christian like the Ku Klux Klan were clearly not Christian, they simply retained residues of the Celtic warrior ethos, that had fused with Christianity to create the Scots-Irish culture that defined a large part of White America. But Christianity proved that it was not the glue of Western civilisation post-war, when an overwhelmingly still Christian society witnessed every large denomination sell out White interests, using scripture to justify it all the way. If Christianity is the ‘water we swim in’, as Tom Holland says, then it created the guilt-complex in White men to betray their own people.
The Arktos Journal article ‘White Advocacy as a Political Paradigm: The Case for Focusing on Race’ persuaded me to make my race a larger part of my identity. Indeed, you only have to listen to the Woke to know what is at the ultimate source of what they hate: Whiteness. It is the movement that underpins every other. Feminism and LGBT are outgrowths of the desire to decrease White birthrates and reduce the health of the White population. The entire ‘Intersectional Coalition’ is very open about the thing they hate, White civilisation; we’re just choosing not to listen to them.
The way I see White advocacy is not the same as others. For instance, I believe anybody who identifies with White civilisation and fights for White interests should be worked alongside, like how all the Woke movements worked with ‘straight White male allies’. But the likes of Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, and Kemi Badenoch are not called ‘Uncle Tom’s/Aunt Jemima’s’ for no reason, Blacks have an impressive sense of group interest, and are correct in sensing that Black Conservatives that we like and admire serve White interests, especially if they agree with us in dismantling DEI, affirmative action, and disparate impact.
I am also unconcerned about interracial marriage; what matters to me is that you identify with White civilisation. Black people generally don’t mind racial intermixing, but they ensure that their mixed race offspring are always pushed towards their non-White side due to Black’s weaponization of the ‘One-Drop Rule’. In contrast, Whites are so pathetic at making their identity something worth celebrating, what person of mixed-ancestry would want to embrace their Whiteness? But the ‘One-Drop Rule’ should be used by us as well. Interracial marriage is in fact good; because the mixed-race child will be more White than their non-White parent. The idea of Whiteness should be as inclusive as possible, and the pro-White coalition should include all who want to fight for the interests of Whites.
Richard Hanania in his famous article ‘Why is Everything Liberal?’ makes the observation that liberals win because they show up and care more. Anti-Woke people lose because they don’t care as much as the Woke activists; they are not prepared to put everything on the line for their ideals. An ‘anti’ ideology, whilst it can be uniting, can never substitute a ‘positive vision’.
Christians make this argument all the time. In order to beat the Woke, they say, you have to be as committed to your principles as they are. Christians correctly sense that IDW and ‘Vitalist’ types are not prepared to endure suffering and persecution like Christians historically have been, prepared to dedicate their entire lives to their faith. They therefore advocate that only Christianity can save the West from Wokeism, something that has been conceded by even irreligious rightists like Evan Riggs and Carl Benjamin.
But has nationalism NOT been something that traditionally people have not cared about? The Springtime of Nations in the 19th century created an explosion in nationalistic sentiment; ‘Elite Human Capital’, poets, novelists, artists, composers, playwrights, dedicated huge proportions of their lives to the cause of nationalism. Whole languages were more-a-less resurrected, like the Czech language. Composers like Wagner and Sibelius certainly cared a great deal about their national heritage.
And looking outside the West today, do secular Israelis not fight and die for the preservation of their people? Do Ukrainians not fight and die for the preservation of their people?
Nationalism is in fact the most ‘logical’ attachment. An connection to one’s kin, their ancestors and a desire to preserve one’s bloodline into the future, is in tune with the laws of nature and Darwinian Evolution.
The ‘14 Words’ are so taboo, because they express something that would make right-wingers far more willing to dedicate their lives to, and have a will that is far stronger than those of feminists and sexual degenerates, the simple statement that: We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children.
The Woke say nation and race is arbitrary, but acknowledge amongst themselves that the goal of that talking point is to shame Whites into abandoning their pride and sense of group solidarity whilst promoting their own, what they call ‘strategic essentialism’. We have learned the hard way that race and nation are NOT arbitrary, and only Whites have been shamed and manipulated into believing in this. The only way to beat Woke identity politics is to have an identitarian movement of our own.
Without belief in God, the only thing in life that matters is the preservation of your culture and people. Indeed, taken to its logical conclusion, the New Atheism of the 2000s was only the first stage of a moral revolution, we must remove all self-loathing, Christian guilt introspection that has destroyed our society since 1945, and do everything in our power to ensure the continuation of our people, like every other race does.
The Virtue of Being a ‘Bigot’
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F60d5e65c-c25b-4c3e-917a-3df210703c3b_1080x1350.jpeg)
The most condescending, humiliating, and degrading word that the Woke throw at all Whites, especially White men, who defend themselves against their ever greater onslaught, is ‘bigot’.
The word serves the same purpose for Whites as a term like ‘uppity nigger’ was for Blacks. It is used to demean and to ostracise, to make us feel morally worthless.
But like Blacks did with the word ‘nigger’, we should wear ‘bigot’ as a badge of honour, requiring double-standards in that we are allowed to say it but our enemies aren’t, just like them. We show our power by being bold and wilful enough to demand that.
It turns out that the ‘bigots’ have always been right. They have been right that the Great Replacement was happening. They were right that Civil Rights laws were pushing anti-White racism. They were right about gay marriage leading down a slippery slope, culminating in the horrors of transgenderism. It was ‘bigots’ who ensured that Western civilisation was able to survive for centuries, and when we stopped listening to the ‘bigots’ was when we woke up to find ourselves ritually humiliated by groups so much lesser than ourselves, but who we allowed to dominate us, because we were afraid of being ‘bigots’.
It angers me when within this space, this word is still used in a non-ironic descriptive way to mean ‘close-mindedness’. But it is such a powerful and degrading word that we need to reclaim it, and wear it as a badge of honour. For the qualities associated with being a ‘bigot’, love for one’s own people, fighting for their interests, not letting other groups and civilisationally corrosive forces like the LGBT corrupt the survival of your group, are not just not bad; they are inherently noble and just.
We should be confident and proud enough to say that ‘the bigots are on the right side of history’. Like Rachel Haywire said, act with swagger and dominance, never let their taunts affect your inner sense of self-worth, know that your anger and threats towards them when you don’t have the power to carry them out is meaningless, but an unshakable sense of self-pride will always get under their skin, just like groups that we see as undeserving like the LGBTs do and how much it enrages us. Know that you belong to a race that conquered and modernised the world, that was the first to industrialise, that created the capacities for space travel. Love your people and love the ‘bigotry’ that defends them.
Is it Too Late?
Open White advocacy scares many people away, because they have been conditioned to believe, over and over again, that it is hopeless. Every upsurge in White identification since 1945, from the National Front in Britain in the 1970s, to American Renaissance and the Paleocon Movement in the 1990s, to the British National Party in the 2000s, and the Alt-Right in 2010s, every single time those movements fell to the ‘anti-fascists’, made up disproportionately of treasonous Whites. They laugh at us, humiliate us, and mock us, saying that any attempt is doomed.
A constant losing streak is indeed disheartening and demoralising. Despite the valiant efforts of so many previous generations of White advocates, for whom their advocacy cost them everything, every single one was defeated, and the corrosive, poisonous forces of anti-Whiteness and Wokeness continued to infect our society, making every generation of Anglo-Saxons more Woke than the last. Any White advocate is immediately expelled from polite society.
But as I have said in my articles on Türkiye and Italy, it is absolutely conceivable for the smug ‘champions of progress’ to finally be humbled. And if one looks at continental Europe, you see that decades of long, arduous work, of building a counter-elite and fighting a metapolitical struggle, is finally starting to pay off. The Populist Right is likely to win the European elections held this month. Marine Le Pen has a good chance of winning the French Presidency next election. Even in Germany, where the level of establishment paranoia and consensus ‘anti-fascism’ is far more pervasive than in the Anglosphere, the AfD is disproportionately supported by young people, who despite grave social sanction, continue to believe what they believe. The ‘anti-fascists’ can no longer hurt them.
If we are truly dedicated, we could easily banish the likes of Hope Not Hate and the various other ‘anti-fascist’ thugs from British society, and make it THEIR views that are ostracised, not ours. The fact that they have more drive than we do is on us, not them. Why should a people that is not prepared to fight against its enemies deserve to survive? There is no ‘right’ to one’s national survival, just as much as the Mammoth had no ‘right’ to not go extinct. Weak peoples who let themselves be led by traitors, like the Woke straight White men of the Anglosphere, who do not enforce a collective group consciousness, vanish from the world, and deserve to. When compared to other nations, Anglo-Saxons are a uniquely cucked group, and Zoomers among them especially.
Do you want straight White men, and by extension straight White women, to regain their honour and status? If so, EARN IT. Fight like the ‘bigot’ they already say you are!
I believe you are badly mistaken in blaming Christianity for today's problems. Many of the big, mainline denominations are completely apostate and have long since traded Scriptural Christianity for left-wing causes.
Much more damaging has been the theory of Darwinism, the belief shared by the vast majority of purveyors of modern Weirdism. The belief that we are essentially nothing but animals; that life has no higher purpose; that there is no God, and the universe came about by accident, with no inherent moral principles; that people are free to invent their own values - these have helped greatly to destroy the elementary respect for self and for human life that is necessary to resist the false ideas of modern secularism.
In the past, when Christianity was inarguably much more influential than it is now, we did not have these problems. It is not Christianity but the rejection of Christianity that has destroyed the sanity and the moral fiber of the West.
To say that it is self-loathing Christian guilt that has destroyed our society since 1945 is completely false. Is that why the hippies were dropping out and smoking dope, because of Christianity? is that why dozens of millions of babies have been killed, because of Christianity? Did Hugh Hefner help to destroy proper concepts of women because of Christianity? Are criminals allowed to steal and commit violent crimes with no repercussions because of Christianity? Is it Christianity that has filled people's minds from childhood on with retarded and degrading TV, movie and pop music trash?
Do you even know what Christianity is?
I agree that there are more progressive zoomers. But the conservative zoomers are *really* conservative, and proud of it. They also appear to be becoming more conservative over time, as a generation. I'm intrigued by what will become of them - I have a lot more hope for them that I do my own millennial generation.